Dissenting, Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000).
Contesto: Time will one day heal the wound to that confidence that will be inflicted by today's decision. One thing, however, is certain. Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year's presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the nation's confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law.
John Paul Stevens: Frasi in inglese
“Money is property; it is not speech.”
Concurring, Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC, 528 U.S. 377 (2000).
Contesto: Money is property; it is not speech. Speech has the power to inspire volunteers to perform a multitude of tasks on a campaign trail, on a battleground, or even on a football field. Money, meanwhile, has the power to pay hired laborers to perform the same tasks. It does not follow, however, that the First Amendment provides the same measure of protection to the use of money to accomplish such goals as it provides to the use of ideas to achieve the same results.
McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission (Majority opinion, 514 U.S. 334 (1995)
Dissenting, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. ___ (2010).
Concurring in the judgment, Baze v. Rees, 553 U.S. 35 (2008).
Dissenting, Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989).
McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission (Majority opinion, 514 U.S. 334 (1995)
Dissenting, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. ___ (2010).
McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission (Majority opinion, 514 U.S. 334 (1995)