Frasi di Max Born

Max Born foto
1  0

Max Born

Data di nascita: 11. Dicembre 1882
Data di morte: 5. Gennaio 1970
Altri nomi:మాక్స్ బార్న్

Pubblicità

Max Born è stato un fisico e matematico tedesco naturalizzato britannico, premio Nobel per la Fisica nel 1954 per le importanti ricerche in meccanica quantistica e in particolare per l'interpretazione statistica della funzione d'onda.

Frasi Max Born

„Can we call something with which the concepts of position and motion cannot be associated in the usual way, a thing, or a particle? And if not, what is the reality which our theory has been invented to describe?
The answer to this is no longer physics, but philosophy.“

— Max Born
Context: Can we call something with which the concepts of position and motion cannot be associated in the usual way, a thing, or a particle? And if not, what is the reality which our theory has been invented to describe? The answer to this is no longer physics, but philosophy. … Here I will only say that I am emphatically in favour of the retention of the particle idea. Naturally, it is necessary to redefine what is meant. For this, well-developed concepts are available which appear in mathematics under the name of invariants in transformations. Every object that we perceive appears in innumerable aspects. The concept of the object is the invariant of all these aspects. From this point of view, the present universally used system of concepts in which particles and waves appear simultaneously, can be completely justified. The latest research on nuclei and elementary particles has led us, however, to limits beyond which this system of concepts itself does not appear to suffice. The lesson to be learned from what I have told of the origin of quantum mechanics is that probable refinements of mathematical methods will not suffice to produce a satisfactory theory, but that somewhere in our doctrine is hidden a concept, unjustified by experience, which we must eliminate to open up the road. The close of his Nobel lecture: [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1954/born-lecture.html "The Statistical Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics" (11 December 1954)]

Pubblicità

„I believe there is no philosophical high-road in science, with epistemological signposts. No, we are in a jungle and find our way by trial and error, building our road behind us as we proceed.“

— Max Born
Context: I believe there is no philosophical high-road in science, with epistemological signposts. No, we are in a jungle and find our way by trial and error, building our road behind us as we proceed. We do not find signposts at crossroads, but our own scouts erect them, to help the rest. Experiment and Theory in Physics (1943), p. 44

„It has taught us new methods of thinking (complementarity), which are applicable far beyond physics.“

— Max Born
Context: I am now convinced that theoretical physics is actually philosophy. It has revolutionized fundamental concepts, e. g., about space and time (relativity), about causality (quantum theory), and about substance and matter (atomistics). It has taught us new methods of thinking (complementarity), which are applicable far beyond physics. Statement of 1963, as quoted in Schrodinger : Life and Thought (1992) by Walter J. Moore, p. 1

„I am now convinced that theoretical physics is actually philosophy.“

— Max Born
Context: I am now convinced that theoretical physics is actually philosophy. It has revolutionized fundamental concepts, e. g., about space and time (relativity), about causality (quantum theory), and about substance and matter (atomistics). It has taught us new methods of thinking (complementarity), which are applicable far beyond physics. Statement of 1963, as quoted in Schrodinger : Life and Thought (1992) by Walter J. Moore, p. 1

„Every object that we perceive appears in innumerable aspects. The concept of the object is the invariant of all these aspects.“

— Max Born
Context: Can we call something with which the concepts of position and motion cannot be associated in the usual way, a thing, or a particle? And if not, what is the reality which our theory has been invented to describe? The answer to this is no longer physics, but philosophy. … Here I will only say that I am emphatically in favour of the retention of the particle idea. Naturally, it is necessary to redefine what is meant. For this, well-developed concepts are available which appear in mathematics under the name of invariants in transformations. Every object that we perceive appears in innumerable aspects. The concept of the object is the invariant of all these aspects. From this point of view, the present universally used system of concepts in which particles and waves appear simultaneously, can be completely justified. The latest research on nuclei and elementary particles has led us, however, to limits beyond which this system of concepts itself does not appear to suffice. The lesson to be learned from what I have told of the origin of quantum mechanics is that probable refinements of mathematical methods will not suffice to produce a satisfactory theory, but that somewhere in our doctrine is hidden a concept, unjustified by experience, which we must eliminate to open up the road. The close of his Nobel lecture: [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1954/born-lecture.html "The Statistical Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics" (11 December 1954)]

„The lesson to be learned from what I have told of the origin of quantum mechanics is that probable refinements of mathematical methods will not suffice to produce a satisfactory theory, but that somewhere in our doctrine is hidden a concept, unjustified by experience, which we must eliminate to open up the road.“

— Max Born
Context: Can we call something with which the concepts of position and motion cannot be associated in the usual way, a thing, or a particle? And if not, what is the reality which our theory has been invented to describe? The answer to this is no longer physics, but philosophy. … Here I will only say that I am emphatically in favour of the retention of the particle idea. Naturally, it is necessary to redefine what is meant. For this, well-developed concepts are available which appear in mathematics under the name of invariants in transformations. Every object that we perceive appears in innumerable aspects. The concept of the object is the invariant of all these aspects. From this point of view, the present universally used system of concepts in which particles and waves appear simultaneously, can be completely justified. The latest research on nuclei and elementary particles has led us, however, to limits beyond which this system of concepts itself does not appear to suffice. The lesson to be learned from what I have told of the origin of quantum mechanics is that probable refinements of mathematical methods will not suffice to produce a satisfactory theory, but that somewhere in our doctrine is hidden a concept, unjustified by experience, which we must eliminate to open up the road. The close of his Nobel lecture: [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1954/born-lecture.html "The Statistical Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics" (11 December 1954)]

„There are metaphysical problems, which cannot be disposed of by declaring them meaningless.“

— Max Born
Context: There are metaphysical problems, which cannot be disposed of by declaring them meaningless. For, as I have repeatedly said, they are "beyond physics" indeed and demand an act of faith. We have to accept this fact to be honest. There are two objectionable types of believers: those who believe the incredible and those who believe that "belief" must be discarded and replaced by "the scientific method." p. 209

Pubblicità

„There are two objectionable types of believers: those who believe the incredible and those who believe that "belief" must be discarded and replaced by "the scientific method."“

— Max Born
Context: There are metaphysical problems, which cannot be disposed of by declaring them meaningless. For, as I have repeatedly said, they are "beyond physics" indeed and demand an act of faith. We have to accept this fact to be honest. There are two objectionable types of believers: those who believe the incredible and those who believe that "belief" must be discarded and replaced by "the scientific method." p. 209

„What can we scientists do in this conflict? We can join the spiritual, religious, philosophical forces, which reject war on ethical grounds. We can even attack the ideological foundations of the conflict itself. For science is not only the basis of technology but also the material for a sound philosophy.“

— Max Born
Context: America has grown by expansion in a practical vacuum; the pioneers of the West had to overcome terrific natural obstacles, but negligible human resistance. The Russia of today had to conquer not only natural but human difficulties: she had to break up the rotten system of the Czars and to assimilate backward Asiatic tribes; now she has set herself the task of bringing her brand of modernization to the ancient civilizations of the Far East. For this purpose it is indispensable to have a well-defined doctrine full of slogans, which appeals to the needs and instincts of the poverty-stricken masses. Thus one understands the power which Marx's philosophy has gained in the East. What can we scientists do in this conflict? We can join the spiritual, religious, philosophical forces, which reject war on ethical grounds. We can even attack the ideological foundations of the conflict itself. For science is not only the basis of technology but also the material for a sound philosophy.

„The scientist's urge to investigate, like the faith of the devout or the inspiration of the artist, is an expression of mankind's longing for something fixed, something at rest in the universal whirl: God, Beauty, Truth.“

— Max Born
Context: The scientist's urge to investigate, like the faith of the devout or the inspiration of the artist, is an expression of mankind's longing for something fixed, something at rest in the universal whirl: God, Beauty, Truth. Truth is what the scientist aims at. He finds nothing at rest, nothing enduring, in the universe. Not everything is knowable, still less predictable. But the mind of man is capable of grasping and understanding at least a part of Creation; amid the flight of phenomena stands the immutable pole of law. Conclusion

„The dance of atoms, electrons and nuclei, which in all its fury is subject to God's eternal laws, has been entangled with“

— Max Born
Context: The dance of atoms, electrons and nuclei, which in all its fury is subject to God's eternal laws, has been entangled with another restless Universe which may well be the Devil's: the human struggle for power and domination, which eventually becomes history. My optimistic enthusiasm about the disinterested search for truth has been severely shaken. I wonder at my simplemindedness when I re-read what I said on the modern fulfilment of the alchemists dream: "Now however, the motive is not the lust for gold, cloaked by the mystery of magic arts, but the scientists' pure curiosity. For it is clear from the beginning that we may not expect wealth too." Gold means power, power to rule and to have a big share in the riches of this world. Modern alchemy is even a short-cut to this end, it provides power directly; a power to dominate and to threaten and hurt on a scale never heard of before. And this power we have actually seen displayed in ruthless acts of warfare, in the devastation of whole cities and the destruction of their population. From the Postcrip to 'The restless universe' (1951), pp. 225-226

Pubblicità

„Naturally, it is necessary to redefine what is meant.“

— Max Born
Context: Can we call something with which the concepts of position and motion cannot be associated in the usual way, a thing, or a particle? And if not, what is the reality which our theory has been invented to describe? The answer to this is no longer physics, but philosophy. … Here I will only say that I am emphatically in favour of the retention of the particle idea. Naturally, it is necessary to redefine what is meant. For this, well-developed concepts are available which appear in mathematics under the name of invariants in transformations. Every object that we perceive appears in innumerable aspects. The concept of the object is the invariant of all these aspects. From this point of view, the present universally used system of concepts in which particles and waves appear simultaneously, can be completely justified. The latest research on nuclei and elementary particles has led us, however, to limits beyond which this system of concepts itself does not appear to suffice. The lesson to be learned from what I have told of the origin of quantum mechanics is that probable refinements of mathematical methods will not suffice to produce a satisfactory theory, but that somewhere in our doctrine is hidden a concept, unjustified by experience, which we must eliminate to open up the road. The close of his Nobel lecture: [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1954/born-lecture.html "The Statistical Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics" (11 December 1954)]

Avanti
Anniversari di oggi
Emily Dickinson foto
Emily Dickinson331
scrittrice e poetessa inglese 1830 - 1886
Giuseppe Prisco36
avvocato e dirigente sportivo italiano 1921 - 2001
Luigi Pirandello foto
Luigi Pirandello175
drammaturgo, scrittore e poeta italiano premio Nobel per... 1867 - 1936
Thomas Merton foto
Thomas Merton43
scrittore e religioso statunitense 1915 - 1968
Altri 49 anniversari oggi
Autori simili
James Jeans foto
James Jeans5
astronomo, matematico e fisico britannico
Henri Poincaré foto
Henri Poincaré12
matematico, fisico e filosofo francese
Freeman Dyson foto
Freeman Dyson17
fisico e matematico statunitense
Erwin Schrödinger foto
Erwin Schrödinger11
fisico e matematico austriaco
Georg Christoph Lichtenberg foto
Georg Christoph Lichtenberg55
fisico, scrittore e aforista tedesco
Jean Baptiste Le Rond d'Alembert foto
Jean Baptiste Le Rond d'Alembert4
enciclopedista, matematico e fisico francese
Giovanni Keplero foto
Giovanni Keplero10
astronomo, matematico e musicista tedesco
Stephen Hawking foto
Stephen Hawking36
matematico, fisico e cosmologo britannico
Richard Feynman foto
Richard Feynman31
fisico statunitense
Gustav Fechner foto
Gustav Fechner1
psicologo e statistico tedesco