Frasi di John Allen Paulos

John Allen Paulos è un matematico statunitense.

✵ 4. Luglio 1945
John Allen Paulos photo
John Allen Paulos: 48   frasi 0   Mi piace

John Allen Paulos: Frasi in inglese

“There is no such thing as free lunch, and even if there were, there’d be no guarantee against indigestion.”

Origine: Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and its Consequences (1988), Chapter 5, “Statistics, Trade-Offs, and Society” (p. 147)

“Any bit of nonsense can be computerized—astrology, biorhythms, the I Ching—but that doesn’t make the nonsense any more valid.”

Origine: Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and its Consequences (1988), Chapter 3, “Pseudoscience” (p. 68)

“Bad things happen periodically, and they’re going to happen to somebody. Why not you?”

Origine: Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and its Consequences (1988), Chapter 4, “Whence Innumeracy?” (p. 110)

“There surely is something to these terms, but too often they’re the result of minds intent on discovering meaning where there is only probability.”

Origine: Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and its Consequences (1988), Chapter 2, “Probability and Coincidence” (p. 62)

“If we’re not keenly aware of the choices we’re making, we’re not likely to work for better ones.”

Origine: Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and its Consequences (1988), Chapter 5, “Statistics, Trade-Offs, and Society” (p. 176)

“To follow foolish precedents, and wink with both eyes, is easier than to think.”

Origine: Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and its Consequences (1988), Chapter 3, “Pseudoscience” (p. 67; quoting William Cowper)

“Correlation and causation are two quite different words, and the innumerate are more prone to mistake them than most.”

Origine: Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and its Consequences (1988), Chapter 5, “Statistics, Trade-Offs, and Society” (p. 159)

“I remember thinking of mathematics as a kind of omnipotent protector. You could prove things to people and they would have to believe you whether they liked you or not.”

Origine: Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and its Consequences (1988), Chapter 4, “Whence Innumeracy?” (p. 99)

“There’s always enough random success to justify almost anything to someone who wants to believe.”

Origine: Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and its Consequences (1988), Chapter 2, “Probability and Coincidence” (p. 44)

“The whole weight of science is the prima facie evidence against a miracle having occurred.”

Part 2 “Four Subjective Arguments”, Chapter 5 “The Argument from Interventions (and Miracles, Prayers, and Witnesses)” (p. 88)
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don’t Add Up (2008)

“Confirmation of a person’s unreliable statement by another unreliable person makes the statement even less reliable.”

Part 2 “Four Subjective Arguments”, Chapter 2 “The Argument from Prophecy (and the Bible Codes)” (p. 65)
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don’t Add Up (2008)

“Claiming that a holy book’s claims are undeniable because the book itself claims them to be is convincing only to the convinced.”

Part 2 “Four Subjective Arguments”, Chapter 2 “The Argument from Prophecy (and the Bible Codes)” (p. 64)
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don’t Add Up (2008)

“Rigid distinctions between the deep and the shallow are generally themselves quite superficial.”

John Allen Paulos libro A Mathematician Reads the Newspaper

Section 5, “Food , Book Reviews, Sports, Obituaries” Introduction (p. 169)
A Mathematician Reads the Newspaper (1995)

“In general, any differences between two groups will always be greatly accentuated at the extremes.”

John Allen Paulos libro A Mathematician Reads the Newspaper

Section 2, “Local, Social, and Business Issues” Chapter 11, “Company Charged with Ethnic Bias in Hiring” (p. 60)
A Mathematician Reads the Newspaper (1995)

“You can only predict things after they’ve happened.”

John Allen Paulos libro A Mathematician Reads the Newspaper

Section 1, “Politics, Economics, and the Nation” Introduction (p. 7; quoting Eugene Ionesco)
A Mathematician Reads the Newspaper (1995)

“Together the, two ingredients—a perceived incongruity with a point and an appropriate emotional climate—seem to be both necessary and sufficient for humor.”

Origine: Mathematics and Humor: A Study of the Logic of Humor (1980), Chapter 1, “Mathematics and Humor” (p. 10)

“While not a panacea, candidly recognizing the absence of any good logical arguments for God’s existence, giving up on divine allies and advocates as well as taskmasters and tormentors, and prizing a humane, reasonable, and brave outlook just might help move this world a bit closer to a heaven on earth.”

Part 3 “Four Psycho-Mathematical Arguments”, Chapter 6 “Atheists, Agnostics, and “Brights”” (p. 149)
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don’t Add Up (2008)

“It’s always healthy to recognize facts.”

Part 3 “Four Psycho-Mathematical Arguments”, Chapter 6 “Atheists, Agnostics, and “Brights”” (p. 146)
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don’t Add Up (2008)

“The universe acts on us, we adapt to it, and the notions that we develop as a result, including the mathematical ones, are in a sense taught us by the universe. Evolution has selected those of our ancestors (both human and not) whose behavior and thought were consistent with the workings of the universe.”

Part 3 “Four Psycho-Mathematical Arguments”, Chapter 4 “The Universality Argument (and the Relevance of Morality and Mathematics)” (p. 131)
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don’t Add Up (2008)

“It’s become somewhat fashionable to say that religion and science are growing together and are no longer incompatible. This convergence is, in my opinion, illusory. In fact, I don’t believe that any attempt to combine these very disparate bodies of ideas can succeed intellectually.”

Part 2 “Four Subjective Arguments”, Chapter 5 “The Argument from Interventions (and Miracles, Prayers, and Witnesses)” (pp. 88-89)
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don’t Add Up (2008)

“For the record, natural selection is a highly nonrandom process that acts on the genetic variation produced by random mutation and genetic drift and results in those organisms with more adaptive traits differentially surviving and reproducing.”

Part 1 “Four Classical Arguments”, Chapter 2 “The Argument from Design (and Some Creationist Calculations)” (p. 19)
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don’t Add Up (2008)

Autori simili

John Nash photo
John Nash 8
matematico ed economista statunitense
Paul Dirac photo
Paul Dirac 3
fisico e matematico britannico
Niels Bohr photo
Niels Bohr 8
fisico e matematico danese
Christopher Morley photo
Christopher Morley 16
scrittore statunitense
Stephen Hawking photo
Stephen Hawking 38
matematico, fisico e cosmologo britannico
Louis-Victor Pierre Raymond de Broglie photo
Louis-Victor Pierre Raymond de Broglie 8
matematico e fisico francese
Bertrand Russell photo
Bertrand Russell 176
filosofo, logico e matematico gallese
Alfred Adler photo
Alfred Adler 7
matematico statunitense
Richard Feynman photo
Richard Feynman 35
fisico statunitense
Ludwig Wittgenstein photo
Ludwig Wittgenstein 112
filosofo e logico austriaco