Frasi di Ernest Gellner

Ernest Gellner è stato un filosofo, antropologo e sociologo inglese.



Di origine cecoslovacca, la sua famiglia emigrò in Inghilterra nel 1939.

Il suo primo libro, Words and Things conteneva un attacco alla filosofia linguistica di Oxford, variante inglese della filosofia analitica di ispirazione wittgensteiniana. Professore di Filosofia, logica e metodo scientifico alla London School of Economics dal 1962 al 1984, poi professore di Antropologia sociale all'Università di Cambridge fino al 1992, infine direttore del nuovo Centro per lo Studio del Nazionalismo a Praga, Gellner combatté per tutta la vita, con il suo insegnamento, con i suoi interventi, le sue pubblicazioni, contro quelli che definiva sistemi chiusi di pensiero, in particolare il comunismo, la psicoanalisi, il relativismo postmoderno. La modernizzazione della società, il nazionalismo e l'Islam furono i temi centrali della sua indagine sociologica.

Gellner ha difeso la tradizione illuminista e il pluralismo liberale, e si è opposto alle ideologie totalitarie, acquistando una meritata reputazione come un nemico degli idoli intellettuali del Novecento, tra cui soprattutto Marx, Freud e Wittgenstein. Gellner ha difeso il ruolo della ragione come guida per la filosofia e per le scienze umane, e ha criticato le correnti relativiste del pensiero contemporaneo, come lo strutturalismo di Lévi-Strauss, l'antropologia interpretativa di Clifford Geertz, e il postmodernismo. Gellner è stato influenzato da Karl Popper, Raymond Aron e Max Weber. Secondo Perry Anderson, tra tutti i sociologi weberiani, Gellner è quello che è restato più vicino ai problemi intellettuali che erano centrali per Weber.

In occasione della sua morte, è stato descritto dal Daily Telegraph come uno degli intellettuali più importanti del mondo, e dal The Independent come un battagliero sostenitore del razionalismo critico. Wikipedia  

✵ 9. Dicembre 1925 – 5. Novembre 1995
Ernest Gellner: 32   frasi 0   Mi piace

Ernest Gellner: Frasi in inglese

“Philosophy is explicitness, generality, orientation and assessment.”

Origine: Words and Things (1959), p. 265
Contesto: Philosophy is explicitness, generality, orientation and assessment. That which one would insinuate, thereof one must speak.

“The way forward does not lie in amateur and comically timeless linguistic sociology which takes ‘forms of life’ for granted (and this is what philosophy has been recently), but in the systematic study of forms of life which does not take them for granted at all.”

The crisis in the humanities and in the mainstream of philosophy (1964), reprinted in The Devil in Modern Philosophy (1974)
Contesto: The way forward does not lie in amateur and comically timeless linguistic sociology which takes ‘forms of life’ for granted (and this is what philosophy has been recently), but in the systematic study of forms of life which does not take them for granted at all. It hardly matters whether such an inquiry is called philosophy or sociology.

“It is the Soft Porn of Irrationalism.”

Concepts and Community, in Relativism and the Social Sciences (1985)
Contesto: Wittgenstein's appeal lies in the fact that he provides a strange kind of vindication of romanticism, of conceptual Gemeinschaft, of custom-based concepts rather than statute-seeking Reform, and that he does so through a very general theory of meaning, rather than from the premisses habitually used for this purpose. Because there is no unique formal notation valid for all speech, each and every culture is vindicated. One never knew that could be done — and so quickly too! It is that above all which endows his philosophy with such a capacity to attract and to repel. His mystique of consensual custom denies that anything can sit in judgment of our concepts, that some may be more rational and others less so. So all of them are in order and have nothing to fear from philosophy, as indeed he insists. This is a fairly mild form of irrationalism, invoking no fierce dark Gods, merely a consensual community. It is the Soft Porn of Irrationalism.

“When knowledge is the slave of social considerations, it defines a special class; when it serves its own ends only, it no longer does so.”

Plough, Sword and Book (1988)
Contesto: When knowledge is the slave of social considerations, it defines a special class; when it serves its own ends only, it no longer does so. There is of course a profound logic in this paradox: genuine knowledge is egalitarian in that it allows no privileged source, testers, messengers of Truth. It tolerates no privileged and circumscribed data. The autonomy of knowledge is a leveller.

“Civil Society is a cluster of institutions and associations strong enough to prevent tyranny, but which are, none the less, entered and left freely, rather than imposed by birth or sustained by awesome ritual.”

Conditions of Liberty (1994)
Contesto: Civil Society is a cluster of institutions and associations strong enough to prevent tyranny, but which are, none the less, entered and left freely, rather than imposed by birth or sustained by awesome ritual. You can join the Labour Party without slaughtering a sheep...

“Addicts would be subject to blackmail.”

Ernest Gellner libro Anthropology and Politics

Anthropology and Politics (1995)
Contesto: I do not recommend any legislative action against hermeneutics. I am a liberal person opposed to all unnecessary state limitation of individual liberties. Hermeneutics between consenting adults should not, in my view, be the object of any statutory restrictions. I know, only too well, what it would entail. Hermeneutic speakeasies would spring up all over the place, smuggled Thick Descriptions would be brought in by the lorry-load from Canada by the Mafia, blood and thick meaning would clot in the gutter as rival gangs of semiotic bootleggers slugged it out in a series of bloody shoot-outs and ambushes. Addicts would be subject to blackmail. Consumption of deep meanings and its attendant psychic consequences would in no way diminsh, but the criminal world would benefit, and the whole fabric of civil society would be put under severe strain. Never!

“Hermeneutics between consenting adults should not, in my view, be the object of any statutory restrictions.”

Ernest Gellner libro Anthropology and Politics

Anthropology and Politics (1995)
Contesto: I do not recommend any legislative action against hermeneutics. I am a liberal person opposed to all unnecessary state limitation of individual liberties. Hermeneutics between consenting adults should not, in my view, be the object of any statutory restrictions. I know, only too well, what it would entail. Hermeneutic speakeasies would spring up all over the place, smuggled Thick Descriptions would be brought in by the lorry-load from Canada by the Mafia, blood and thick meaning would clot in the gutter as rival gangs of semiotic bootleggers slugged it out in a series of bloody shoot-outs and ambushes. Addicts would be subject to blackmail. Consumption of deep meanings and its attendant psychic consequences would in no way diminsh, but the criminal world would benefit, and the whole fabric of civil society would be put under severe strain. Never!

“I do not recommend any legislative action against hermeneutics.”

Ernest Gellner libro Anthropology and Politics

Anthropology and Politics (1995)
Contesto: I do not recommend any legislative action against hermeneutics. I am a liberal person opposed to all unnecessary state limitation of individual liberties. Hermeneutics between consenting adults should not, in my view, be the object of any statutory restrictions. I know, only too well, what it would entail. Hermeneutic speakeasies would spring up all over the place, smuggled Thick Descriptions would be brought in by the lorry-load from Canada by the Mafia, blood and thick meaning would clot in the gutter as rival gangs of semiotic bootleggers slugged it out in a series of bloody shoot-outs and ambushes. Addicts would be subject to blackmail. Consumption of deep meanings and its attendant psychic consequences would in no way diminsh, but the criminal world would benefit, and the whole fabric of civil society would be put under severe strain. Never!

“America was born modern; it did not have to achieve modernity, nor did it have modernity thrust upon it.”

Ernest Gellner libro Anthropology and Politics

Anthropology and Politics (1995)

“Capital, like capitalism, seems an overrated category.”

Origine: Nations and Nationalism (1983), Chapter 7, A Typology Of Nationalism, p. 97

“Just as every girl should have a husband, preferably her own, so every culture must have its state, preferably its own.”

The Coming of Nationalism and Its Interpretation: The Myths of Nation and Class in Mapping the Nation

“Tribalism never prospers, for when it does, everyone will respect it as a true nationalism, and no-one will dare call it tribalism.”

Origine: Nations and Nationalism (1983), Chapter 6, Social Entropy And Equality, p. 87

“Obstruction of mobility, where it occurs, is one of the most serious and intractable problems of industrial society.”

Origine: Nations and Nationalism (1983), Chapter 8, The Future Of Nationalism, p. 114

Autori simili

Zygmunt Bauman photo
Zygmunt Bauman 63
sociologo e filosofo polacco
Umberto Galimberti photo
Umberto Galimberti 99
filosofo e psicoanalista italiano
Jane Goodall photo
Jane Goodall 8
etologa e antropologa britannica
Max Weber photo
Max Weber 18
economista, sociologo, filosofo e storico tedesco
Michel Foucault photo
Michel Foucault 25
sociologo, filosofo e psicologo francese
Rudolf Steiner photo
Rudolf Steiner 72
filosofo, esoterista e pedagogista austriaco
Carl Gustav Jung photo
Carl Gustav Jung 130
psichiatra, psicoanalista e antropologo svizzero
Erich Fromm photo
Erich Fromm 100
psicoanalista e sociologo tedesco
John Galsworthy photo
John Galsworthy 6
scrittore inglese
Theodor W. Adorno photo
Theodor W. Adorno 31
filosofo, musicologo e aforista tedesco