Frasi di John Danforth

John Claggett "Jack" Danforth è un politico e diplomatico statunitense, senatore per lo stato del Missouri dal 1976 al 1995 e rappresentante permanente alle Nazioni Unite fra il 2004 e il 2005. Wikipedia  

✵ 5. Settembre 1936
John Danforth photo
John Danforth: 22 citazioni0 Mi piace

John Danforth: Frasi in inglese

“God's purpose exceeds whatever we can put in an agenda.”

John Danforth

Page 189
Faith and Politics (2006)
Contesto: It is concern that precedes and inspires agendas, and survives when agendas fail, and it causes us to try again, always trying our best, never certain about our own judgment. It is knowing that God's purpose exceeds whatever we can put in an agenda.

“Reconciliation depends on acknowledging that God's truth is greater than our own, that we cannot reduce it to any political platform we create, no matter how committed we are to that platform, and that God's truth is large enough to accommodate the opinions of all kinds of people, even those with whom we strongly disagree.”

John Danforth

Page 16
Faith and Politics (2006)
Contesto: Whether religion is a divisive or reconciling force depends on our certainty or our humility as we practice our faith in our politics. If we believe that we know God's truth and that we can embody that truth in a political agenda, we divide the realm of politics into those who are on God's side, which is our side, and those with whom we disagree, who oppose the side of God. This is neither good religion nor good politics. It is not consistent with following a Lord who reached out to a variety of people — prostitutes, tax collectors, lepers. If politics is the art of compromise, certainty is not really politics, for how can one compromise with God's own truth? Reconciliation depends on acknowledging that God's truth is greater than our own, that we cannot reduce it to any political platform we create, no matter how committed we are to that platform, and that God's truth is large enough to accommodate the opinions of all kinds of people, even those with whom we strongly disagree.

“As a senator, I worried every day about the size of the federal deficit. I did not spend a single minute worrying about the effect of gays on the institution of marriage.”

John Danforth

Op-Ed essay &quot;In the Name of Politics&quot;, in The New York Times (30 March 2005) http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/30/opinion/30danforth.html <br class="br">Contesto: As a senator, I worried every day about the size of the federal deficit. I did not spend a single minute worrying about the effect of gays on the institution of marriage. Today it seems to be the other way around.

“Whether religion is a divisive or reconciling force depends on our certainty or our humility as we practice our faith in our politics.”

John Danforth

Page 16
Faith and Politics (2006)
Contesto: Whether religion is a divisive or reconciling force depends on our certainty or our humility as we practice our faith in our politics. If we believe that we know God's truth and that we can embody that truth in a political agenda, we divide the realm of politics into those who are on God's side, which is our side, and those with whom we disagree, who oppose the side of God. This is neither good religion nor good politics. It is not consistent with following a Lord who reached out to a variety of people — prostitutes, tax collectors, lepers. If politics is the art of compromise, certainty is not really politics, for how can one compromise with God's own truth? Reconciliation depends on acknowledging that God's truth is greater than our own, that we cannot reduce it to any political platform we create, no matter how committed we are to that platform, and that God's truth is large enough to accommodate the opinions of all kinds of people, even those with whom we strongly disagree.

“I was raised in a Republican household during the glory days of "I like Ike!””

John Danforth

I am currently an independent voter who votes on the integrity of the individual and the facts surrounding the issues. I have read the Mueller Report, and recently listened to the televised Congressional Mueller hearings, and listened to analysis by both CNN and Fox. As a citizen, I have come to the conclusion that President Trump attempted to obstruct Mueller’s investigation in multiple ways.
The OLC opinion blocked Mueller from indicting a sitting president, but he stated that an ordinary citizen facing these charges would face a criminal indictment.
It’s up to us to decide and act on Trump (2019)

Autori simili

Ivo Andrič photo
Ivo Andrič14
scrittore e diplomatico jugoslavo None
Paul Claudel photo
Paul Claudel19
poeta, drammaturgo e diplomatico francese None
Giorgos Seferis photo
Giorgos Seferis5
poeta, saggista e diplomatico greco None
Les Brown photo
Les Brown1
politico statunitense None
Dwight David Eisenhower photo
Dwight David Eisenhower15
34º presidente degli Stati Uniti d'America None
Pablo Neruda photo
Pablo Neruda79
poeta e attivista cileno None
Piero Calamandrei photo
Piero Calamandrei90
politico italiano None
Jair Bolsonaro photo
Jair Bolsonaro20
politico brasiliano None
Kurt Vonnegut photo
Kurt Vonnegut29
scrittore e saggista statunitense None
Sri Jawaharlal Nehru photo
Sri Jawaharlal Nehru60
politico indiano None