Frasi di Martin Buber
pagina 2
22 citazioni che esplorano saggezza, educazione, solitudine e autenticità del mondo

Scoprite la profonda saggezza di Martin Buber attraverso le sue celebri citazioni. Esplora i temi dell'educazione, dell'incontro, della solitudine, della storia, dei viaggi, dell'autenticità e della natura abbracciabile del mondo. Immergetevi nelle sue parole penetranti e lasciatevi ispirare.

Martin Mordechai Buber, nato a Vienna, è stato un filosofo, teologo e pedagogista austriaco naturalizzato israeliano. È noto per aver introdotto il movimento hassidim nella cultura europea e per la sua idea che la vita sia fondamentalmente basata sull'intersoggettività anziché sulla soggettività. Durante la sua carriera, ha studiato filosofia, filologia e storia dell'arte a Vienna, Lipsia, Berlino e Zurigo. Ha aderito al movimento sionista nel 1898 ma si è distanziato dalle posizioni del fondatore Theodor Herzl. Nel 1948 ha trasferito in Israele dove lavorò per promuovere la convivenza tra ebrei e arabi.

Durante la sua vita, Buber ha pubblicato diverse opere importanti, come "Io-tu" nel 1923 e "Vie dell'Utopia" nel 1946. Ha ricevuto diversi premi prestigiosi, tra cui il premio Goethe nel 1951 e il premio Erasmus nel 1963. È morto il 13 giugno 1965 a Gerusalemme.

✵ 8. Febbraio 1878 – 13. Giugno 1965
Martin Buber: 80 citazioni72 Mi piace

Martin Buber frasi celebri

Martin Buber frase: “Tutti gli uomini hanno accesso a Dio, ma ciascuno ha un accesso diverso.”

Frasi su Dio di Martin Buber

Frasi sulla vita di Martin Buber

Martin Buber Frasi e Citazioni

Martin Buber frase: “Nessun uomo è pura persona, nessuno è pura individualità. […] Ognuno vive nell'Io dal duplice volto.”

“Il successo non è uno dei nomi di Dio.”

Martin Buber

citato in Enzo Bianchi, La differenza cristiana, Einaudi, 2006, II, 3

Martin Buber: Frasi in inglese

“When we see a great man desiring power instead of his real goal we soon recognize that he is sick, or more precisely that his attitude to his work is sick.”

Martin Buber

Origine: What is Man? (1938), p. 180
Contesto: When we see a great man desiring power instead of his real goal we soon recognize that he is sick, or more precisely that his attitude to his work is sick. He overreaches himself, the work denies itself to him, the incarnation of the spirit no longer takes place, and to avoid the threat of senselessness he snatches after empty power. This sickness casts the genius on to the same level as those hysterical figures who, being by nature without power, slave for power, in order that they may enjoy the illusion that they are inwardly powerful, and who in this striving for power cannot let a pause intervene, since a pause would bring with it the possibility of self-reflection and self-reflection would bring collapse.

“To win a truly great life for the people of Israel, a great peace is necessary, not a fictitious peace, the dwarfish peace that is no more than a feeble intermission, but a true peace with the neighboring peoples, which alone can render possible a common development of this portion of the earth as the vanguard of the awakening Near East.”

Martin Buber

"Our Reply" (September 1945), as published in A Land of Two Peoples : Martin Buber on Jews and Arabs (1983) edited by Paul Mendes-Flohr, p. 178
Variant translation: Only a true peace with neighboring peoples can render possible a common development of this portion of the earth as a vanguard of the awakening of the Near East.

“Through the Thou a person becomes I.”

Martin Buber libro I and Thou

I and Thou (1923)

“Life, in that it is life, necessarily entails justice.”

Martin Buber

"Politics and Morality" in Be'ayot (April 1945), as published in A Land of Two Peoples : Martin Buber on Jews and Arabs (1983) edited by Paul Mendes-Flohr, p. 169

“An example may clarify more precisely the relation between the psychologist and the anthropologist. If both of them investigate, say, the phenomenon of anger, the psychologist will try to grasp what the angry man feels, what his motives and the impulses of his will are, but the anthropologist will also try to grasp what he is doing. In respect of this phenomenon self-observation, being by nature disposed to weaken the spontaneity and unruliness of anger, will be especially difficult for both of them. The psychologist will try to meet this difficulty by a specific division of consciousness, which enables him to remain outside with the observing part of his being and yet let his passion run its course as undisturbed as possible. Of course this passion can then not avoid becoming similar to that of the actor, that is, though it can still be heightened in comparison with an unobserved passion its course will be different: there will be a release which is willed and which takes the place of the elemental outbreak, there will be a vehemence which will be more emphasized, more deliberate, more dramatic. The anthropologist can have nothing to do with a division of consciousness, since he has to do with the unbroken wholeness of events, and especially with the unbroken natural connection between feelings and actions; and this connection is most powerfully influenced in self-observation, since the pure spontaneity of the action is bound to suffer essentially. It remains for the anthropologist only to resign any attempt to stay outside his observing self, and thus when he is overcome by anger not to disturb it in its course by becoming a spectator of it, but to let it rage to its conclusion without trying to gain a perspective. He will be able to register in the act of recollection what he felt and did then; for him memory takes the place of psychological self-experience. … In the moment of life he has nothing else in his mind but just to live what is to be lived, he is there with his whole being, undivided, and for that very reason there grows in his thought and recollection the knowledge of human wholeness.”

Martin Buber

Variante: An example may clarify more precisely the relation between the psychologist and the anthropologist. If both of them investigate, say, the phenomenon of anger, the psychologist will try to grasp what the angry man feels, what his motives and the impulses of his will are, but the anthropologist will also try to grasp what he is doing. In respect of this phenomenon self-observation, being by nature disposed to weaken the spontaneity and unruliness of anger, will be especially difficult for both of them. The psychologist will try to meet this difficulty by a specific division of consciousness, which enables him to remain outside with the observing part of his being and yet let his passion run its course as undisturbed as possible. Of course this passion can then not avoid becoming similar to that of the actor, that is, though it can still be heightened in comparison with an unobserved passion its course will be different: there will be a release which is willed and which takes the place of the elemental outbreak, there will be a vehemence which will be more emphasized, more deliberate, more dramatic. The anthropologist can have nothing to do with a division of consciousness, since he has to do with the unbroken wholeness of events, and especially with the unbroken natural connection between feelings and actions; and this connection is most powerfully influenced in self-observation, since the pure spontaneity of the action is bound to suffer essentially. It remains for the anthropologist only to resign any attempt to stay outside his observing self, and thus when he is overcome by anger not to disturb it in its course by becoming a spectator of it, but to let it rage to its conclusion without trying to gain a perspective. He will be able to register in the act of recollection what he felt and did then; for him memory takes the place of psychological self-experience. … In the moment of life he has nothing else in his mind but just to live what is to be lived, he is there with his whole being, undivided, and for that very reason there grows in his thought and recollection the knowledge of human wholeness.
Origine: What is Man? (1938), pp. 148-149

“To be old is a glorious thing when one has not unlearned what it means to begin, this old man had perhaps first learned it thoroughly in old age.”

Martin Buber

Origine: Eclipse of God: Studies in the Relation Between Religion and Philosophy (1952), p. 6

“As the oil is in the olive, so is the teshuvah, repentance, hidden within sin.”

Martin Buber

Origine: For The Sake of Heaven (1945), p. 44

Autori simili

Rudolf Steiner photo
Rudolf Steiner72
filosofo, esoterista e pedagogista austriaco None
Paulo Freire photo
Paulo Freire7
pedagogista brasiliano None
Ludwig Wittgenstein photo
Ludwig Wittgenstein112
filosofo e logico austriaco None
Peter Handke photo
Peter Handke13
romanziere e drammaturgo austriaco None
Ludwig von Mises photo
Ludwig von Mises21
filosofo, economista None
Maria Montessori photo
Maria Montessori31
pedagogista, filosofa e medico italiana None
Henri Bergson photo
Henri Bergson16
filosofo francese None
Erwin Schrödinger photo
Erwin Schrödinger11
fisico e matematico austriaco None
Hans Urs Von Balthasar photo
Hans Urs Von Balthasar370
presbitero e teologo svizzero None
 Ermes Ronchi photo
Ermes Ronchi72
presbitero e teologo italiano None