Frasi di Friedrich August von Hayek

Friedrich August von Hayek è stato un economista e sociologo austriaco naturalizzato britannico.

Pensatore liberale e liberista, è stato uno dei massimi esponenti della scuola austriaca e critico dell'intervento statale in economia. Nel 1974 è stato insignito, insieme a Gunnar Myrdal, del Premio Nobel per l'economia "per il lavoro sulla teoria monetaria, sulle fluttuazioni economiche e per le analisi sull'interdipendenza dei fenomeni economici".

Ha elaborato una critica al modello di Welfare State, sebbene favorevole a forme di reddito di base, che lo spinse a mettere in discussione le tesi di Keynes.

Hayek venne influenzato dal fondatore della scuola economica austriaca, Ludwig von Mises. Ebbe una lunga amicizia con il filosofo viennese Karl Popper. Hayek ha influenzato tutto l'ambiente del libertarianismo, segnatamente Murray Rothbard della scuola anarcocapitalista, Robert Nozick e anche Milton Friedman , che però poi lo criticarono per alcuni aspetti.

Nel 1944 pubblicò la sua opera più celebre, La via della schiavitù. Wikipedia  

✵ 8. Maggio 1899 – 23. Marzo 1992   •   Altri nomi Friedrich von Hayek, Фридрих Август фон Хайек

Lavori

La via della schiavitù
Friedrich August von Hayek
La società libera
Friedrich August von Hayek
Friedrich August von Hayek: 107   frasi 5   Mi piace

Friedrich August von Hayek frasi celebri

Frasi sull'et di Friedrich August von Hayek

Frasi sulla libertà di Friedrich August von Hayek

Friedrich August von Hayek Frasi e Citazioni

“Nel Mondo occidentale alcune disposizioni per coloro che sono minacciati dagli estremi di indigenza o dalla fame per circostanze al di là del loro controllo sono stati da tempo accettati come dovere della comunità. La necessità di una simile disposizione in una società industriale è indiscussa, sia solo nell'interesse di coloro che richiedono protezione contro atti di disperazione da parte dei bisognosi.”

Variante: Nel Mondo occidentale alcune disposizioni per coloro che sono minacciati dagli estremi di indigenza o dalla fame per circostanze al di là del loro controllo sono stati da tempo accettati come dovere della comunità. La necessità di una simile disposizione in una società industriale è indiscussa - sia solo nell'interesse di coloro che richiedono protezione contro atti di disperazione da parte dei bisognosi. (da La società libera)

“Il controllo economico non è il semplice controllo di un settore della vita umana che può essere separato dal resto; è il controllo dei mezzi per tutti i nostri fini.”

Origine: In AA.VV., Il libro della politica, traduzione di Sonia Sferzi, Gribaudo, 2018. ISBN 9788858019429

Friedrich August von Hayek: Frasi in inglese

“The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.”

Friedrich Hayek libro The Fatal Conceit

Origine: 1980s and later, The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism (1988), Ch. 5: The Fatal Conceit.
Contesto: Whereas, in fact, specialised students, even after generations of effort, find it exceedingly difficult to explain such matters, and cannot agree on what are the causes or what will be the effects of particular events. The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.
To the naive mind that can conceive of order only as the product of deliberate arrangement, it may seem absurd that in complex conditions order, and adaptation to the unknown, can be achieved more effectively by decentralizing decisions and that a division of authority will actually extend the possibility of overall order. Yet that decentralization actually leads to more information being taken into account.

“It is no exaggeration to say that the central aim of socialism is to discredit those traditional morals which keep us alive.”

"The Origins and Effects of Our Morals: A Problem for Science", in The Essence of Hayek (1984)
1980s and later

“The more the state "plans" the more difficult planning becomes for the individual.”

Origine: 1940s–1950s, The Road to Serfdom (1944), Chapter 6: Planning and the Rule of Law

“Well, I would say that, as long-term institutions, I am totally against dictatorships. But a dictatorship may be a necessary system for a transitional period. At times it is necessary for a country to have, for a time, some form or other of dictatorial power. As you will understand, it is possible for a dictator to govern in a liberal way. And it is also possible for a democracy to govern with a total lack of liberalism. Personally I prefer a liberal dictator to democratic government lacking liberalism.”

Interview in El Mercurio (1981)
1980s and later
Contesto: Well, I would say that, as long-term institutions, I am totally against dictatorships. But a dictatorship may be a necessary system for a transitional period. At times it is necessary for a country to have, for a time, some form or other of dictatorial power. As you will understand, it is possible for a dictator to govern in a liberal way. And it is also possible for a democracy to govern with a total lack of liberalism. Personally I prefer a liberal dictator to democratic government lacking liberalism. My personal impression — and this is valid for South America — is that in Chile, for example, we will witness a transition from a dictatorial government to a liberal government. And during this transition it may be necessary to maintain certain dictatorial powers, not as something permanent, but as a temporary arrangement.

“I have arrived at the conviction that the neglect by economists to discuss seriously what is really the crucial problem of our time is due to a certain timidity about soiling their hands by going from purely scientific questions into value questions.”

Conversation at the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C. (9 February 1978); published in A Conversation with Friedrich A. Von Hayek: Science and Socialism (1979)
1960s–1970s
Contesto: I have arrived at the conviction that the neglect by economists to discuss seriously what is really the crucial problem of our time is due to a certain timidity about soiling their hands by going from purely scientific questions into value questions. This is a belief deliberately maintained by the other side because if they admitted that the issue is not a scientific question, they would have to admit that their science is antiquated and that, in academic circles, it occupies the position of astrology and not one that has any justification for serious consideration in scientific discussion. It seems to me that socialists today can preserve their position in academic economics merely by the pretense that the differences are entirely moral questions about which science cannot decide.

“Yet that decentralization actually leads to more information being taken into account.”

Friedrich Hayek libro The Fatal Conceit

Origine: 1980s and later, The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism (1988), Ch. 5: The Fatal Conceit.
Contesto: Whereas, in fact, specialised students, even after generations of effort, find it exceedingly difficult to explain such matters, and cannot agree on what are the causes or what will be the effects of particular events. The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.
To the naive mind that can conceive of order only as the product of deliberate arrangement, it may seem absurd that in complex conditions order, and adaptation to the unknown, can be achieved more effectively by decentralizing decisions and that a division of authority will actually extend the possibility of overall order. Yet that decentralization actually leads to more information being taken into account.

“Any kind of discrimination — be it on grounds of religion, political opinion, race, or whatever it is — seems to be incompatible with the idea of freedom under the law. Experience has shown that separate never is equal and cannot be equal.”

"Conversation with Systematic Liberalism," Forum (September 1961). <!-- p. 6. ; also in Friedrich Hayek : A Biography (2003) by Alan O. Ebenstein-->
1960s–1970s
Contesto: nowiki>[Apartheid law in South Africa] appears to be a clear and even extreme instance of that discrimination between different individuals which seems to me to be incompatible with the reign of liberty. The essence of what I said [in The Constitution of Liberty] was really the fact that the laws under which government can use coercion are equal for all responsible adult members of that society. Any kind of discrimination — be it on grounds of religion, political opinion, race, or whatever it is — seems to be incompatible with the idea of freedom under the law. Experience has shown that separate never is equal and cannot be equal.

“Our basic problem is that we have three levels, I would say, of moral beliefs. We have the first instance, our intuitive moral feelings which are adapted to the small, person-to-person society where we act for people whom we know and are served by people whom we know. Then, we have a society governed by moral traditions which, unlike what modern rationalists believe, are not intellectual discoveries of men who designed them, but as a result of a persons, which I now prefer to describe as term of 'group selection.' Those groups who had accidentally developed such as the tradition of private property and the family who did succeed, but never understood this. So we owe our present extended order of human cooperation very largely to a moral tradition which the intellectual does not approve of, because it has never been intellectually designed and it has to compete with a third level of moral beliefs, those which the morals which the intellectuals designed in the hope that they can better satisfy man's instincts than the traditional morals to do. And we live in a world where three moral traditions are in constant conflict, the innate ones, the traditional ones, and the intellectually designed ones, and ultimately, all our political conflicts of this time can be reduced as affected by a conflict between free moral tradition of a different nature, not only of different content.”

in 1985 interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11AXDT5824Y with John O'Sullivan
1980s and later

“Since the value of freedom rests on the opportunities it provides for unforeseen and unpredictable actions, we will rarely know what we lose through a particular restriction of freedom.”

“Principles or Expediency?” Toward Liberty: Essays in Honor of Ludwig von Mises on the Occasion of his 90th Birthday (29 September 1971)
1960s–1970s

Autori simili

Joseph Stiglitz photo
Joseph Stiglitz 5
economista e saggista statunitense
Milton Friedman photo
Milton Friedman 56
economista statunitense
John Maynard Keynes photo
John Maynard Keynes 45
economista britannico
John Nash photo
John Nash 8
matematico ed economista statunitense
Luigi Pirandello photo
Luigi Pirandello 166
drammaturgo, scrittore e poeta italiano premio Nobel per la…
William Golding photo
William Golding 14
scrittore britannico
Paul Dirac photo
Paul Dirac 3
fisico e matematico britannico
Peter Higgs photo
Peter Higgs 1
fisico britannico
Daniel Kahneman photo
Daniel Kahneman 7
psicologo israeliano
Stephen Leacock photo
Stephen Leacock 8
scrittore, economista